God, in light of the distinctive features of morality, can be argued to be their best explanation.Ģ. The argument instead highlights the fact that there must be a sufficient basis for there to be objective morality. In fact, I know several atheists who are more moral than some theists! Religious leaders in the New Testament were among the biggest detractors and critics of Jesus. If God does not exist, then objective morality becomes much more difficult to explain. Rather, the argument usually deals with grounding and substantiating objective morality. The moral argument is not about belief in God. Are you saying that atheists can’t be moral?” “But I’m a moral person and I don’t believe in God. Here are five of the most common objections to the argument and why, in my view, they are not insuperable.ġ. ![]() Moral facts are best explained by God’s existence. In its abductive form, the moral argument seeks to infer God as the best explanation for the moral facts about the universe. By Paul Rezkalla The Moral Argument for the existence of God has enjoyed a long tradition of defense from theistic philosophers and thinkers throughout the history of Western thought…and a long tradition of misunderstandings and objections from even some of the most brilliant minds.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |